sonora2sonoma

  • Floating in a medium

    Somewhere Between the micro and the macro–

    The world of microbes

    And that of galaxies–

    And, lacking the ability

    To deeply peer

    In either direction,

    To probe what mysteries lie beyond our senses

    And other means of detection,

    Or even to suss out where

    In the entire panoply of existence,

    We truly belong,

    We nonetheless fancy ourselves,

    Unashamedly,

    And without a speck of proof,

    The masters of our fates–

    Assuming ourselves invincible,

    The dominant species–

    Even though the extent of our domain

    Fails to reach

    So far as the tips of our noses

    Or that our existence

    Serves a purpose far different

    Than our imaginations would lead us to believe

    And not one in which

    We play the starring roles.

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.19

  • Letter to the editor from an acquaintance disparaging Joe Biden over his abuse allegations:

    Stop Joe Biden

    EDITOR: I just watched a Jon Stewart clip from 2015 showing Joe Biden leering at and touching the female family members, including children, of people being sworn into the Senate. The victims were clearly uncomfortable. It was a truly sickening spectacle. If he behaves this way when he knows he’s being photographed, I can only imagine what he is doing behind closed doors.

    Biden wasn’t my first choice among the Democratic primary candidates, but I was willing to support him as the lesser of two evils. Not anymore. I’ve been an active Democrat all my life, but I will not vote for creepy “Uncle Joe.” Not even if it means another four years of Donald Trump.

    No point in exchanging one sleaze bag for another, especially if it illustrates that there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans after all. If Democrats claim to represent any sort of moral high ground, we must oppose Biden as president. I, for one, will be supporting someone with integrity. Or no one.

    Jane Smith

    My response to Jane’s letter:

    Dear Jane,

    I just read your letter to the editor in the newspaper. Did you say that you see no difference between Republicans and Democrats based solely on your perception that Biden shares trump’s lack of integrity? It’s pretty apparent that Joe Biden is a touchy-feely sort of person. Some people might find his style uncomfortable; I see it as the innocent actions of a man who cares deeply about people and isn’t afraid to show his affection publicly. If he’s guilty of anything, it’s his failure to pick up on peoples’ vibes when his actions make them uncomfortable.

    It’s important to remember that the allegation against Joe is unproven, whereas the president has been seen and heard on national television bragging publicly about how he likes to grope women’s private parts. And then there are the hookers he has obviously paid off to keep quiet about his adulterous liaisons. How can you weigh the two and find them of equal import?

    Personally, I don’t believe the woman’s claims. That sort of behavior is totally out of character for the Joe Biden I see and hear, and her accusation completely lacks corroborating evidence. The PBS News Hour did an in-depth segment on the Biden allegation Friday night. I believe it’s archived online at KQED. The way I see it, Joe’s no more a sexual predator than Sponge Bob is. I’m not one for conspiracy theories, but I strongly suspect someone in trump’s or the Russians’ orbit paid her to falsely accuse him.

    Besides that, your statement that you won’t vote for Biden even if it means another four years of trump is astonishing. Do you realize what you are saying? Do you want another conservative justice to be appointed to the Supreme Court? Do you want to see Roe vs Wade overturned? Do you want to see children remain in cages at the border? Do you want to see our country to continue to be pitied abroad? Do you want to see trump and Barr finish their job of dismantling our government’s system of checks and balances? Do you want to see the rescinding of what few environmental regulations remain?

    Are you prepared to own your share in bringing about the end of life as we know it?  Because, if that monster gets another four years in the White House, that is what your vote, or you’re not voting or throwing away your vote by writing in someone else will help bring about.

    Words have power, and your words, published in a newspaper, just might sway a few votes away from sanity. Whatever you think Biden did or didn’t do, is it so bad you’re willing to risk your children’s’ futures over it?

    If your answer is yes, then I’m sorry, but I have nothing more to say to you.  

    Tim Konrad

  • This morning greeted me with a quote of Jack Kornfeld’s, “Many people have their first spiritual experience in childhood, that of an innate and natural connection with what is sacred and holy.”  

    After reading it, my thoughts took me back to a time, early in my childhood, that I haven’t visited in years, and reminded me of what it felt like when my life was infused with that magical quality one experiences before the weight of the world takes hold and drowns it out.

    When I was new to this world, my consciousness was infused with a sense of purity and wholesomeness that enabled a connection with my “child within.” To merely say “enabled,” however, fails to fully describe what that was like. A more accurate description would be to say my inner child embodied me so completely there was no room for anything else to enter and spoil its serenity.

    I’ve always been in touch with my conscience; its guidance has ever proven true and especially so when telling me things I didn’t want to hear at the time. In my childhood, my conscience was unblemished, and accordingly, my perspective was unblemished too. My thoughts as a child were free of any of the associated sorrows that accompany regrets, the stains that color one’s awareness after having failed to live up to one’s guiding principles. There were no dark clouds hovering overhead threatening to overwhelm should one stray too far from the path. In that regard, I was, unknowingly, free of both the past and the future and totally immersed in the present.

    It was in that state and from that point of reference that I would view the behavior of the adults in my world, often with bemusement, but always with the sure understanding that they were incapable of understanding the world I and my childhood friends inhabited. The behavior of the grownups always displayed a quality that indicated they just didn’t get it! When it came to understanding that which was crystal clear to my friends and me about what was important and what was not, it was clear that what we found funny, interesting, worthwhile, or, conversely, what to us seemed tedious, vexing or oppressive about any given situation was vastly different from how the grownups viewed things.

    The other kids in my circle all innately understood the parameters of the world we shared with each other and the sensibilities associated with it. From that perspective, the adult world at times seemed foolish, undoubtedly alien and certainly not a place we had any interest in inhabiting at the cost of losing touch with our child-natures.

    I would puzzle over witnessing the adults, time after time, failing to grasp the significance of a given encounter or being able to see it through my eyes. Each succeeding encounter would reaffirm my conviction that my parents and their friends had somehow lost touch with the common understanding my friends and I shared about what it felt like to be a child.

    On more than one occasion, I remember swearing never to allow myself to drift so far from my childhood understanding as to cost me that sense of wonder my parents had lost touch with; it seemed so fundamental to my notions at the time that losing that connection seemed inconceivable.

    And then, one day, I realized that connection had become broken.

    I hadn’t seen it coming. I hadn’t been aware a change had been taking place at the time and I don’t know when it occurred; I only realized after the fact that the part of me I swore I’d never lose touch with had somehow given me the slip when I wasn’t watching. I had now, in the parlance of childhood, become an “adult.”

    ***

    In looking back, one particular event stands out as relevant to my attempt to tease apart the threads that might explain how it came to pass that I lost that understanding that had formerly bridged the gap between the two different worlds inhabited by grownups and children.

    In the times in which I grew into my teenage years, two things appeared in my still-forming mind as essential to understanding what constituted being an “adult”—cigarettes and alcohol. Such notions as responsibility were mostly foreign to me back then. At the time, it seemed everyone smoked tobacco in some form or another, even the president, and alcohol was ubiquitous. My mother smoked cigarettes, my father a pipe and an occasional cigar, and the town we lived in had more taverns than churches. Since my parents were fond of popping into a bar for a few drinks on a Saturday night, and bringing me along with them, I knew most of the bartenders and innkeepers by their first names.

    As a result, I started smoking cigarettes when I was 16 and continued until I turned 29, and the lure of alcohol began attracting me about the same time. In addition to concealing my newfound “vices” from my parents, I also had to devise means of circumventing the laws prohibiting minors from partaking of such things, both of which required a certain level of dishonesty on my part.

    I now view these little deceits as incremental steps in the gradual erosion of the clear conscience that I had enjoyed in my early years.

    But one seminal moment stands out in my long, slow descent into the corruption of spirit that helped facilitate my fall from grace.

    The liquor laws made it difficult for teens such as me and my friend to obtain alcohol and often required devious means of coming by it. One such means was thievery. I had been raised never to steal for any reason, the lesson being deeply embedded in my psyche; yet necessity, as they say, is the mother of invention. Desperate measures lead to fertile ground in which justifications pop up like seedlings on warm spring afternoons—justifications designed to ameliorate whatever misgivings one might have about violating taboos. That settled, a plan took form.

    The idea was to “lift” a quart of scotch whiskey from a downtown drugstore. The problem was, I lacked the courage to shoplift, persuading a boy one year my junior to pull of the heist in my stead. Why I chose scotch is an enduring mystery! The taste of it sickens me to this day. Maybe the attractive shape of the bottle is what lured me, but such was the plan, and my accomplice pulled it off without a hitch.

    The success of our venture was, for me, short lived, as it was accompanied by a heavy inner sense of darkness, of gloom that unrelentingly permeated my thoughts. Up until that moment, my connection with my child nature had remained secure and clear as it had always been. I remember being aware just following the caper that something about that connection felt different. My conscience was no longer clear, and the threads that had connected my child-mind to my evolving adult awareness had been severed. Try as I might to trace the threads so I could re-establish that connection, I was no longer able to do so. I fell into depression, I felt unclean, unworthy. I began leading a secret life in which I was one step removed from full participation in my surroundings. If people only knew, I secretly thought, what a bad person I was, they would no longer want to associate with me. I felt ashamed of what I’d done and fearful that my parents might find out and be disappointed in me, which actually happened because of what followed, but that is a story for another day.

    The upshot of all this is that I continued to be plagued by thoughts of unworthiness for decades afterward. And my connection with my child-mind has never been re-established, except on occasion under certain circumstances, and then only for periods of short duration.

    A lot of things have transpired since that time, both in my inner world and in the world at large:  Neither bears much resemblance to the state of things extant when I was a child. A quote from a Grateful Dead tune sums it up succinctly “What a long, strange trip it’s been!”

    As I said, it’s been years since I’ve visited these recollections of a mind-space that once seemed so essential to my very existence.

    The rest of Kornfeld’s quote goes, “The playfulness, joy and curiosity of our childhood can become a foundation for the delighted rediscovery of this spirit in our practice.”  That might just be the key to re-establishing that connection.

    As Paramahansa Yogananda once said, “Everything the Lord has created is to try us, to bring out the buried soul immortality within us. That is the adventure . . the one true purpose of life. And everyone’s adventure is different, unique.”

    Different, yet I suspect in other ways universal, common and shared by all: Only the details differ.

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.15

  • Seniority

    I sometimes recall

    an afternoon long ago.

    I was sitting on a couch with Harry, my first wife’s father

    visiting an old friend of his, a man named Hastings White.

    Hastings was a poet, an eccentric and an intriguing man

    with an air of mystery surrounding his Bohemian persona.

    Unshaven, disheveled, and clearly at home in his humble lean-to of a dwelling,

    the remnants of his love of cheap wine—

    an impressive mound of empty wine bottles—

    rising like an edifice through the weeds

    that grew unbridled behind his house.

    Harry was, like Hastings, a man of impressive sensibilities,

    possessed of a singularly inquisitive mind and towering intellect;

    his accomplishments were many and varied.

    It was Springtime.

    We were drinking beer

    and talking of important things–

    of life and art and Zen–

    all matters of terrible import to me

    for I was a dreamer

    even back then.

    Me in my mid-twenties

    and they in their late forties

    we carried on,

    me mostly listening,

    to the exchange

    taking place between these two fascinating men.

    I sensed mystery, excitement,

    stimulation of the kind

    that occurs when people of exceptional intellect

    engage in the trade of ideas and concepts.

    I remained silent, mostly,

    not because I had figured out at that point in my life

    how much more there is to be gained by keeping one’s mouth shut

    and one’s ears wide open,

    not because I didn’t have that much to add

    to the discourse, (although, reflecting back, I realize I didn’t),

    for beer can loosen tongues that ought not be set free,

    but mostly because I didn’t want to appear foolish,

    to demonstrate my ignorance,

    to interrupt the illuminating discourse

    to which I was privileged to bear witness.

    At a certain point,

    I don’t recall exactly when,

    our host said something

    that struck singular resonance with my father-in-law,

    Harry responding with a laugh and a knowing smile aimed at his friend.

    I couldn’t quite make out what was said

    but, sensing its importance, I sought clarification

    and was told, in essence,

    that I wouldn’t have understood it had they explained it to me,

    that there were some things—

    they said in amusement—

    that you just had to be older

    in order to understand.

    Tim Konrad

    Originally written 2015.02.17

    Revised 2020.04.02

  • Each morning, and some afternoons too, a small bird appears outside my office window pecking at the glass panes as if it believes that in persisting, it just might get lucky one time and win the jackpot by gaining entry to my abode. I can’t for the life of me imagine what the nature of that jackpot might be, however, since being bird-brained is not among the many things of which I’ve been accused over the years.

    The bird returns, nonetheless, every morning appearing refreshed and ready to rap on the glass until it grows weary of the effort and retires to wherever it is that birds go to rest themselves before returning to the battle.

    If the bird were somehow to gain access to my keep, what would be its next move, I wonder? What mysterious attraction might my book-bedecked and monitor-adorned work-space hold for my avian infiltrator? No bugs, seeds, nuts or other such tidbits would it find, no branches in which to build its nest and no mate with whom to fulfill its biological imperative.

    No, were the bird somehow to manage pulling off popping in, only diminished sunlight, slightly stale air and shadowed crannies would be found. The few spiders it might locate could provide it nourishment for a while, but only until they grew scarce. Safe haven from the predatory felines who roam the environs outside my window would be certain, but at what price? The bird’s need to eat would eventually overcome its fear of being eaten and it would, as they say, fly the coop.

    Except birds aren’t known for negotiating the labyrinthine nature of enclosures such as mine, and my little bird-brained excursionist would become bewildered by the baffling business of bringing to light the way out. It would likely end with me having to shoo the little bugger out with a broom, which would be terrifying for the bird and exasperating for me.

    So, sorry, little bird. Despite your persistent pecking at my pane, my prerogative must, of needs, prevail and you should probably pigeonhole your pursuit and pinpoint other possible activities with which to be preoccupied.

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.09

  • professor trump’s magical medicine show continues to hawk hydroxyquinone, albeit less publicly than before, as a cure-all capable of quelling coronavirus. One of his former faithful reportedly said, after shining the light of Donald up his butt for 3 hours and injecting himself with the trumpster’s proprietary brand of bleach, CoronaBGone, “I have seen the light of Donald and it isn’t very bright.”

    Advertised, by the professor who had an uncle who was a scientist, as a cure for anything but tree-hugging libtards, a number of individual’s  close associates have reported, after witnessing their friends inject CoronaBgone,  hearing them complain of an uncomfortable burning sensation in their extremities just before they fell into a coma.

    Professor trump was not available for comment, but his  spokesperson, Ima Loser, pointed out that the product’s labelling clearly indicates, in 3 pt Helvetica, that the professor disavows any and all  responsibility for the use of his product unless you‘re a registered Republican and your gross annual income exceeds 50 million dollars.

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.06

     

  • When does enough become ENOUGH?

    This morning’s painful perusal of the daily dispatches from the world outside my keep provides yet more proof of the prescience of Nancy Pelosi ‘s pronouncement that “all paths led to trump.”

    As the contradictory messages keep coming out, as expert medical advice keeps being ignored, the lies, false promises, unobserved guidelines, unmet deadlines and outlandish recommendations continuing to emanate from trumply’s puny pig’s ass of a puss have failed to diminish. Despite his deceitful attempts to rewrite history, however, there’s no way even trump can completely obscure news of the rapidly rising body count—the true measure of the “success” he so proudly if childishly proclaims.

    Following the ongoing saga of the president’s veering trajectory is like watching a diapered monarch running rampant minus a regent to provide him guidance. Our situation is not that different and begs the question “where have the adults gone?” Is there no one left with the standing, fortitude and good sense to send this toddling miscreant to his room?

    The deceit of the man-child is staggering! It’s one thing to tell lies; its quite another to tell lies that result in getting people killed. If it’s wrong to encourage someone to drink a poisonous substance that leads to their death, is it any more right, really, to do what trump is doing by encouraging states to reopen in defiance of his own governments’ guidelines to wait until certain benchmarks have first been achieved?

    Of course, we know only too well by now that when his plans go south, as all such dreams inevitably do, trumply will assume no responsibility for their failure. It’s been clear for some time now to anyone breathing who’s not yet succumbed to his stupefying spell that the man is 15 ounces short of a pound, yet people still hold him in deference (or pretend to), as if he were a reasonable adult possessed of the abilities requisite to actually perform the role he so embarrassingly pretends to pull off.

    The news media, in their insistence their broadcasts represent “balanced” reporting, continue to treat his views as if they were equivalent in substance to those of his opponents instead of the unreasoned and deranged diatribes of the madman he’s devolved into.

    Far too many congressional representatives and other government officials continue to act as if their chief executive can provide rational guidance and decision-making when in fact it is painfully obvious he cannot.

    I continue to find it beyond inexplicable that no one appears willing to engage the only mechanism in view short of an electoral defeat to unseat this miserable menace plaguing our airways, our minds, our liberties and our very lives. While the election may bring about the change in direction this nation sorely needs, the prospect of the damages that could be wrought upon the country in the next two weeks by trump’s sociopathic governance, let alone the next 7 months, is frightening to contemplate.

    It’s time to call for the invocation of the 25th Amendment!

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.05

  • The Rush to Ruin

    While the president is pushing to reopen the country, the NYT reports today that his administration is privately projecting daily death tolls to nearly double this month.

    The president wants very much for business to reopen and for things to return to normal as soon as possible, but that can never happen while his administration remains abnormal.

    As long as trump remains committed to two conflicting goals in his schizoid approach to testing—on the one hand promising expanded testing (that isn’t happening) and on the other doing everything in his power to see that the numbers of those infected remain as low as possible—the numbers of tests administered will remain low and under-reporting of confirmed cases will continue.

    As long as the president continues to demonstrate his failed leadership by leaving it to states’ governors to provide the leadership he is unwilling or incapable of providing, the uniformity of decision-making necessary to mount a united front in the battle to stem the pandemic will not occur.

    The president can have his say, businesses may reopen, services may even return to some semblance of normal, but until a vaccine has been developed and is readily available, count me among those who will not enter their premises or avail myself of their services, except when unavoidable to obtain groceries and the like.

    I’ve never had a taste for Russian roulette.

    Tim Konrad

     

  • As the public proceeds with perambulating in proximate parkland places following the partial lifting of park-use prohibitions, the prolonged padlocking of public portals for peeing promotes the prospect of people peeing in parkland settings where proclamations prohibit such ploys.

    County officials have announced they are going to soon reopen certain parks to walk-in access so those living near them can easily go to them, but they’re going to leave the bathrooms closed for now. Upon learning of the plan, I got to thinking about what might go wrong with such a plan and, as sometimes happens, it got me going.

    Do they really expect people will go before they go out and then go no more after they’ve gone? Having to go out of their way to go won’t go very far with folks who’ve gone already but still need to go again. The authorities might be going out on a limb if they’re really going to try to stop people from going any more after they’ve gone out; their plan just might go south on them. People are liable to just up and go tell the authorities to go climb a rock or go jump in the lake or go to hell, where there’s likely no place to go.

    Being told where they can go and where they can’t go won’t go over very well with the go-to crowd either, what with the get-up-and -go they display once they get going. These folks won’t be willing to go the distance in going out of their way to make sure they don’t have to go once they’ve gone. Neither will the people who have no place they can go before going out because they have no place to go to begin with.

    It’s going to take time to see if anything goes awry with this plan.

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.02

     

  • 2020-05-01-02

    Photo from East Bay Times

    The city of Antioch’s planning commission chairman, Ken Turnage II, made news recently after he posted a Facebook message suggesting the coronavirus should be allowed to take its course and rid society of its most vulnerable members. Likening Covid-19 to a forest fire that rids the land of its “old trees, fallen brush and scrub-shrub sucklings,” he claimed doing so would be for the betterment of the nation, as it would lessen the burden on Social Security, eventually lower health care costs and free up housing.

    Following the blowback his post generated, Turnage said his post was “not malicious or racist.” A quick online search for the definition of the word found that ‘malicious’ is defined as “characterized by malice; intending or intended to do harm.” While he may not have believed he was aiming to be malicious, Turnage cannot deny that harm would come to people were his ideas put into practice–he even admitted there would be “significant loss of life.” His attempt to say he didn’t mean what he said is reminiscent of many of the stunning statements made by president trump, whose skill in separating actions from consequences while completely disavowing responsibility is well documented.

    Turnage’s subsequent attempts to clarify his position dug his hole even deeper as he waxed philosophical in an attempt to anoint his cold-blooded reasoning with high-minded abstractions like maintaining earth’s “ecological balance.” Claiming the virus should be viewed as a means of ridding the planet of its unwanted and burdensome surplus of outdated people, he likened the virus to a volcano erupting to lower the earth’s temperature.

    While declaring he was not recommending allowing the virus to kill the homeless outright, Turnage nonetheless referred to them as “side effects.” His words, disgusting and offensive as they were, took libertarianism to another level while echoing overtones of Nazism.

    This particular style of people simultaneously talking out of both sides of their mouths is familiar to anyone who frequents news broadcasts these days, but the callousness with which this man was doing so was shocking.

    Turnage claimed the virus might be just what it takes to bring the world back into balance. Antioch’s planning commission should take heed and act to oust Turnage so that they can return balance to their association.

    Tim Konrad

    2020.05.01