sonora2sonoma

  •  

    The Ahwanee Hotel

    wears its name

    like a well broken-in

    pair of shoes;

    like the song you find

    hard to get out of your head;

    like an old smell

    that sweeps you back in an instant

    to a long-forgotten childhood moment;

    the old familiar name

    rolls off the tongue

    with the familiarity

    of a lovers touch

    and the comfort

    found in a relationship built on trust.

     

    Corporations may cause it to be assigned other titles

    like the Majestic Yosemite Hotel

    or some other such nonsense

    in their unsavory quest for dominion

    but I will not participate in this dishonorable exercise.

    I will continue to simply call it the Ahwanee!

     

    To call it by any other name

    Would be heresy.

     

    14 January 2016

    Tim Konrad

  • Life In Between

    We live on the margins–

    A fragile sliver of Bio -dynamism

    a thin veneer of subsisting and persisting vitality

    Floating above the slow churn

    the sea of magma

    at our planet’s core,

    While suspended beneath

    The soundless

    and boundless

    vacuum of space.

     

    Two lifeless realms

    Between which we, like pastrami on rye,

    reside, placed, by design or mere circumstance–

    Take your pick–

     

    A Cambium layer, of sorts,

    Comprising the whole of life as we know it

    within its boundaries of metaphorical phloem and xylem

    And, upon which we depend for our very existence.

    Venture too far in either direction

    And existence becomes extinction!

     

    Yet emotions rule when reason should prevail

    And lessons go unheeded, much less learned

    And fools do what they always have done

    And bad choices beget their own destiny

    And the most vulnerable among us

    Always pay the bill.

     

    12 January 2016

    Tim Konrad

     

     

  • The Wild West may still be happening

    in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge

    or at least a watered-down version of it.

     

    News reports of men with guns

    expressing their displeasure

    with the Federal Government

    by making a statement

    via armed occupation

    while relying on that self-same government

    in the guise of the Post Office

    for the delivery of snacks and sox

    which, had they made provision for beforehand,

    they would not have had to muddy up their message

    so.

     

    And the message?

    taking back the land

    for the people.

    Begs the question, one might ask,

    to which “people” are they referring?

    The people from whom they wish to reclaim the land in question

    are you and me and, yes,

    even the occupiers themselves,

    which is to say, being federal land,

    the taxpayers.

     

    Why would these occupying forces

    wish to reclaim land

    they already own?

     

    So, it isn’t really about reclaiming the land

    is it?

    If not that, then what?

    What drives these men

    with their pickups and their guns

    to go camping in the dead of winter

    without any snacks

    or extra socks?

     

    To reclaim the land for the “people”

    makes no sense

    when the people already own

    the land.

     

    And what is so important

    about their dubious quest

    as to drive them to threaten an armed confrontation?

    To engage in a game of chicken

    with forces that could pluck their feathers with ease

    were they inclined to do so.

     

    The leader of this group

    claims the refuge

    constitutes an “unconstitutional presence”

    in the country.

    One wonders

    where he gets his information.

    Certainly not from a civics class!

     

    One might assume they are in earnest

    in choosing to forego snacks

    and sox

    in the hope that their logically challenged enterprise

    might prevail.

     

    One might also assume

    the armed campers

    seek to return the land to the “right” people

    so that the wrong ones

    can be designated as trespassers.

     

    And one might reasonably assume

    that their game of chicken

    will, in the end,

    cause them to be forced to eat crow.

     

    Which, since they chose to enact their ill-fated drama

    in a bird sanctuary

    may not be an entirely inappropriate

    outcome.

     

    07 January, 2016

    Tim Konrad

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Epitaph

    “They were short-sighted

    and overly optimistic”

    people will say of us

    after we’ve finished ruining the world.

    That is,

    that’s what the kind ones

    will say.

     

    06 January 2016

    Tim Konrad

  • After 50 plus similar votes

    the puppet-show

    that comprises the current majority

    in the House of Representatives

    has, once again,

    voted to repeal

    the Affordable Care Act,

    Once again

    wasting resources and time,

    that could have been devoted

    to worthy and timely causes,

    while tilting at windmills

    at the expense of you and me and all the rest of us.

     

    Imagine

    what might have been accomplished

    if they had put all that effort and time

    into something more productive

    like, maybe, passing legislation

    to address our nation’s many

    pressing needs.

     

    This time, it’s being claimed,

    they are doing something different–

    passing a bill

    that will actually get to

    the President’s desk–

    where he will–

    No Surprise–

    veto it!

     

    Something symbolic, they are saying.

    Something to appeal to their constituency.

    Something to evidence

    that they are doing what they were sent there

    to do–

    only, by most accounts,

    the Affordable Care Act

    is accomplishing handily

    what it was intended to do.

    Maybe they should take notice!

     

    By forcing a veto,

    they are saying,

    they are shining a spotlight

    on how the policies of the current administration

    differ from their positions–

    as if there were any lack of clarity in that regard–

    but their actions do nothing

    to clarify what kind of a health care plan

    they would seek to implement

    were they to succeed

    in undoing the one currently serving so many

    for whom health care was previously unreachable.

     

    Speaking of constituencies,

    these folks weren’t elected

    by the Koch brothers

    or their ilk!

    But the votes they submit

    and the priorities they espouse

    represent them nonetheless.

     

    There might have been a time in the past

    when a man’s lies

    were more likely to catch up with him

    but not anymore.

    Today

    politicians routinely make the most outrageous claims imaginable

    yet go unchallenged.

    What has become of accountability?

     

    I wish someone would explain to me

    what it is about Obamacare

    that the puppet-masters

    find objectionable.

    Just what underlies

    the reprehensible rhetoric

    and the downright dishonesty,

    the fabricated fictions

    and the opaque obfuscations

    driving their divisiveness.

     

    But, I confess,

    the answer, should I find it,

    would likely only increase my cynicism,

    for the common threads–

    money, power and influence–

    that bind corrupt politicians to their wealthy donors

    and the bogus causes they champion

    are the same strings upon which they dance

    to their masters’ whims

    to our peril

    and to theirs too, were they only able to see it.

     

    06 January 2016

    Tim Konrad

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Question:

    Do you think there is some way for humanity to evolve beyond the state* which you describe?

    (*A state in which ignorance and fear underlie acts of unspeakable violence perpetrated against those perceived as different from, and therefore a threat to, established order).

    Answer:

    I don’t have any answers. I am just describing what I see and feel. It seems like greed, fear, envy, dishonesty–all that “me first” crap–is perennial and ubiquitous. That said, I do believe in evolution and I would like to believe that we as a species are evolving too–evolving spiritually–and there seem to be signs that support this idea.

    But I also believe in cycles and the idea that everything is in motion, not just in an atomic sense but in every way imaginable.

    We humans, or at least a great many of us, like to dream of a future where everything will be all sunshine and roses, metaphorically speaking. We look forward to a time in which things will be just right, and we persist in this manner of thinking despite overwhelming evidence, from personal experience as well as the history of civilization, that things just don’t work out that way 99.99% of the time.

    I am reminded of the story of the collapse of the Holy Roman Empire subsequent to the death of their emperor, Charlemagne. History regards him as a great leader who ruled his empire at the pinnacle of its power and influence. It took his sons, after his passing, less than a generation, driven by greed and envy and the lust for power, to destroy what their father had made.

    Not only does each generation have its own ideas about what constitutes a desirable state of affairs or living arrangement, but each person also has their own unique views on the subject.

    So why do we persist in the belief that we can have paradise here on Earth, that things can be manipulated in such a way as to assure their longevity and permanence, when we ourselves have none?

    I am taken by an idea from Indian astrology that I found years ago in Paramahansa Yogananda’s book “Autobiography of a Yogi,” that posits that civilizations cycle, over a period of many thousands of years, between the opposites of enlightenment and, for lack of a more fitting word, endarkenment. This idea makes sense if one believes, as I do, that this physical world we share is not all there is, that the physical world is only a school, an educational opportunity, a stop along the way to something different.

    Viewing things this way also enables me to take a longer view of events and serves to remind me, when something terrible happens, that it’s just part of the whole dance of the cycles. In seeing the world as a school, events, be they hopeful or worrisome, have less import.

    In taking the view that life is a learning opportunity, the dualities of light and darkness become essential, and adversity and misfortune are recognized for what can be learned from them.

    Viewing evolution as a part of a great cycle also squares experientially with what I’ve come to regard as the one great immutable “law” of life: The only constant in life, and its sole guarantee, is that change will occur.

  • An old woman

    thrown to the ground

    stones hurled at her

    struck with fists, feet

    face bloodied

    then hoisted atop a low roof

    as if in reprieve

    only to be drug back down into the mob

    pelted with rocks

    pushed over a barricade

    beaten with sticks . . .

     

    An old woman

    probably somebody’s grandmother

    kicked repeatedly

    as she lay on the ground

    slowly dying.

     

    Words appear across the screen

    below the grisly images–

    “She threw a Koran in the trash.”

    As if, by so explaining,

    the reason was sufficient cause

    to justify such violence and cruelty.

    What may have been considered reasonable

    in the 7th Century

    does not seem reasonable at all

    when viewed on my 21st Century

    social media device.

     

    Seventh Century mayhem

    care of 21st Century technology

    but the mayhem seems equally at home

    here, now as then, there

    for barbarity needs no home page

    much less a fixed time location.

     

    Her murderers

    appeared driven by rage

    such was the violence inherent in the scene

    but the underlying motive

    was fear disguised as outrage

    The fear of a people threatened

    by an act they could not abide–

    the perceived desecration

    of a symbol of their faith;

    an action so unreasonable to their way of thinking

    that their outrage blinded them

    to the outrageousness of their response.

     

    The arrogance that underlies

    any notion

    that MY beliefs entitle me

    to take your life

    simply because your views differ from mine

    is stunning beyond belief!

    Yet, inhuman as it is,

    so very human.

     

    It is easy

    to appreciate our connectedness

    to each other

    as seen in the love of a mother to her child

    or in acts of piety and self-sacrifice.

    It is much harder to see it

    when violence is acted out

    against the defenseless.

    But how is it any less real

    when viewing our brethren murder each other?

    Are we somehow less connected

    to them?

     

    What words are there

    to describe the feelings

    that arise as I sit, bearing witness,

    to this unspeakable act,

    taking place

    thousands of miles and another world away

    connected

    not just by my Iphone

    but by the invisible bonds that connect us all

    to each other.

     

    One thing seems certain:

    Any religion

    that is based on fear

    is not a religion dedicated to

    the celebration of life.

     

    So, I sit here, in relative safety

    (if such a condition truly exists)

    worlds away from the scene on my Iphone.

    And I sip my beer

    and watch the ducks lazily floating in the river.

    While trying to reckon with the dissonance

    between the visions in my mind’s eye

    and the beauty of my outward surroundings.

    That violence may not be here, now

    but the fear that drives it

    is never far away.

     

    29 December 2015

    Tim Konrad

     

     

     

     

  • Perspective

    strawberry fall 2010

     

    Feathers unruffled

    despite the bombardment

    ducks slip past,

    the salvo’s meaning

    lost to them.

     

    19 December 2015

    Tim Konrad

  • Egrets

    strawberry fall 2010

     

    A swarm

    of egrets

    incurvate

    wound round

    a dream.

     

    19 December 2015

    Tim Konrad

  • Abalone

    strawberry fall 2010

     

    Even molluscs

    seek security

    in unlikely places.

     

    18 December 2015

    Tim Konrad