sonora2sonoma

  • (continued from yesterday)

    Between Anchorage and McGrath lay the perpendicular Alaska Range, a jumble of sharp, inverted triangular peaks  interspersed with equally sharp triangular canyons, tooth-like and threatening in appearance. There were no flat areas to be seen anywhere. One massif in  particular appeared to display several thousands of feet of sheer, vertical wall.

    The Cessna’s lone engine revved  higher and louder as we ascended to the altitude necessary to clear the peaks, at times sputtering as if it were about to quit. Each time the engine began to sputter, I looked about in hopes of spying a flat area where we could land if the engine didn’t recover its equilibrium, finding nothing but sharp points sticking up menacingly at every turn. Dave, meanwhile, pulled on what looked like a manual choke knob each time it misfired to smooth the engine to a more assuring hum.  Unlike a choke, Dave explained, the engine was “icing up” and pulling on the knob was a “de-icing” procedure.  

    After what seemed like an eternity of verticality, the mountains gave way to more hospitable terrain. 

    We were still some ways from McGrath and the sun was growing nearer the horizon, casting long shadows over the landscape sprawled below. Dave reached down into a compartment and pulled out a large flight map, spreading it open across his lap and perusing it thoughtfully.

    I had assumed that Dave’s flight to Anchorage to pick me up was something if not routine then certainly not novel. I now learned my assumption had been dead wrong. His pilot friends had urged him beforehand not to undertake a journey of that length until he’d logged more flight time. I recalled my unease upon learning earlier that day that his plane had required maintenance prior to our return flight to Nome.

    “I think we’re about here,” he’d said, pointing his finger to a spot on the map. It wasn’t reassuring to now learn that we were somewhat off course and he was attempting to locate us on his map in order to get us back on the right path to McGrath.

    This wasn’t the last time I would recall the words he’d spoken in enticing me to come to Alaska “We’ll have some fun, do some flying and, if we’re lucky, we won’t crash and die.”

    My ability to recount this tale these many years later attests to the fact that Dave did succeed in getting us back on course. We made it to McGrath and landed without incident.

    While at the airfield, I received my first lesson in the importance of meteorology in a region where the accuracy of weather forecasting is a matter of life and death. I was amazed by the sophistication of the weather apparatus servicing such a small community literally in the middle of nowhere. From the conning tower to the weather radar to the video monitors reporting live footage from various airstrips across the region, the array of equipment present was more like one might expect to see in a busy metropolitan airport.

    I recall standing in the conning tower that evening looking out on the airfield and seeing the assortment of tundra-camouflaged bush planes parked beside the tarmac. I asked the official in charge of the operation the purpose of the camouflage. His reply: “That’s what Fish & Game would like to know too.” I was surprised to learn the area was a magnet for international trophy hunters and supported a thriving business for wilderness guides, not all of it legal.

    I was all in favor of dropping in for a beer at the only tavern in town before going on to our hosts’ home, but Dave had other thoughts. Arriving at our destination, our hosts were very gracious and happy to put us up for the night.

    Tim Konrad

    (To be continued . . . )

  • My first trip to Alaska, now nearly forty years ago, was borne of an urge to “get out of Dodge,” an attempt to flee the scene before my ex-wife did likewise, taking the kids with her, to Idaho, with her new boyfriend. It was 1981 and I was sorely in need of a change.

    I had grown up in the same house, in the same neighborhood, from infancy to adulthood. Over those years I’d formed many friendships only to see each of my friends move away, leaving me with the sense of loss such forced separations often engendered. 

    This time I was determined not to be the one left behind—the pain would have been too great—so I decided it would be me who would do the leaving. Friends in Alaska, Nome to be exact, had been encouraging me to visit for several years. I had always resisted the journey because the idea of leaving someplace temperate for somewhere colder seemed a crazy choice for a person who, like me, worshipped warm weather.

    But it was the first of October, and, with the prospect of winter’s cold drawing nearer regardless, going north seemed, under the circumstances, not too great a price  to pay for a change of perspective. And besides, wasn’t the temperature a matter of relativity anyway?  So, I went.

    The trip involved a number of “firsts” for me. I had never before flown on a commercial airliner, had never ventured so far from home, and the only international boundary I had crossed at that point was the one between the US and Mexico.

    Excited but apprehensive, I boarded an Alaska Airlines flight bound for Anchorage with a layover in Seattle to change planes. I was surprised to learn the distance I would travel was nearly 3,500 miles. Since much of the distance from Seattle northward would take place over water, I paid rapt attention to every detail of the flight attendant’s explanation concerning  the safety measures in place in the event, however unlikely, that we might experience an ocean splashdown.

    My close friend and host-to-be in Nome, Dave, had used stark imagery in enticing me to come to his part of the world. Dave, a former Marine paratrooper turned general contractor and aspiring bush pilot, embodied an ironic pragmatism in his approach to life. I remember him telling me, by way of dangling what he viewed as an attractive proposition to persuade me to come visit, “Come on up. We’ll have some fun, do some flying and, if we’re lucky, we won’t crash and die.”

    Oddly, considering the turn my life had recently taken, his sales pitch hadn’t sounded that bad.  

    When I deplaned in Anchorage an experienced, if not seasoned air traveler, Dave was waiting for me, having flown down from Nome in his single-engine Cessna 180. After stowing what little I had brought with me in the plane’s cargo hold, Dave proceeded to pay the mechanic for the work he’d just completed on the aircraft. Sensing my curiosity, Dave explained that the plane required two alternators, and that one of them had malfunctioned on his trip down. Asked if that sort of thing happened often, and if it was something to be concerned about, He assured me it wasn’t any reason for worry.

    The approximately 500-mile flight to Nome, Dave told me, would take two days, with a stopover in a village called McGrath. We would be largely following the route taken by the famed Iditarod dogsled race. We would spend the night in McGrath with friends, he explained. McGrath sat practically in the center of the sprawling state, on the banks of the Kuskokwim River.

    (To be continued)

    Tim Konrad

  • Penny-wise . . .

    Those who decry

    Money spent on Martian rovers

    Also deny

    Mankind’s questioning nature—

    The essence of what makes us

    Who we are.

    Such poverty of spirit

    Has no place

    Among those

    Who would sail to the stars.

    The human spirit

    Demands more!

    Were it otherwise,

    We would never have risen

    Beyond mere existence.

    Tim Konrad

    February 19, 2021

  • Hauling Baggage

    Hauling baggage

    Loaded with items

    Intended to provide

    Diversions for defeating

    The odd bout

    Of ennui

    Should it appear,

    Spread its dreaded tentacles—

    Extended filaments

    Of spiritual listlessness—

    And Envelope me in

    Befuddled boredom,

    Always hopeful

    For success,

    I’ve seldom traveled light

    Always bringing

    Bemusement buffers

    Built to hold boredom

    At bay.

    But, busying oneself

    Doesn’t block boredom from breaching

    Any better than buying

    New things can solve

    That empty yearning

    Slyly lurking, surreptitious,

    In wait of quiet moments

    To seize advantage

    And take command of my senses

    Wanting More. More. More.

    Neither addresses

    The poverty of spirit

    That robs life

    Of meaning;

    Neither can fill the void

    Created in lieu of

    An unfulfilled heart

    Nor command the attention

    Needed

    To hear the heart’s call.

    Tim Konrad                                                          February 16, 2021

  • Any remnants of moral authority the United States still retained with which to champion the cause of democracy in the eyes of the world was forfeited today by the actions of 43 Republican senators who chose naked self-interest over duty to protect and defend the Constitution from brazen and grievous attack by a man whose dishonor they now share in equal measure. Their actions bring shame upon us all.

    These 43 men and women forfeited what might have been an opportunity for redemption; a chance to course-correct their party from sailing the raging seas of sedition back toward the safer waters of reason; a way to wrest control away from the neo-fascist obstructionists among them and return to the business of actual legislation, of performing the jobs for which they were sent to Congress.

    But no! They took the cowards’ route instead. They sold us all out!

    McConnell’s post-acquittal rebuke of the former president would be laughable if it weren’t so lamentable. Too little too late, his condemnation will only serve to confuse, given that he sided with the majority of his fellow Republicans in voting to acquit.

    Following the conclusion of the Senate trial, Impeachment Manager Eric Swalwell shared that a friend tweeted to commend him on the House team’s presentation but faulted them on their jury selection.

    The former Speaker’s reliance on a technicality, made relevant solely through his action in delaying the impeachment until after the inauguration of President Biden, is specious, despicable, shamelessly hypocritical, and, woefully, predictable.

    Afterward, Nancy Pelosi posited rhetorically, “What is more important than the political future of any of us than the Constitution of the United States?”

    The 43 Republican senators who failed to place country over party today answered that question with the votes they cast, while the world looked on in disbelief.

    In acquitting the former president, these 43 Republican senators further empowered a man already drunk with his illusion of importance, while providing encouragement to those who still view him as their leader. To say this is the height of folly is not hyperbole!

    Now that the former president believes he’s been vindicated, he’s already firing up his engines to further fan the flames of faux grievance within his base.

    A man named Joseph de Maistre wrote, in 1811, “Every nation gets the government it deserves,” echoing similar sentiments expressed previously by Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and others. During the just-concluded trial, House Manager Jeremy Ruskin observed, “This trial isn’t really about (the former president), it’s about who we are.”  

    In the Bible it is written, “Those (who) sow the wind . . shall reap the whirlwind.” (Hosea 8:7)

    So, buckle up, ladies and gentlemen! Secure your carry-on items under your seats and prepare for major turbulence! We’re in for a rough ride!

    Tim Konrad                                                         February, 13, 2021

  • The Threat Within

    We must never forget what occurred at the Capital on Jan 6, but we must not overlook the panoply of grievances, many of them unsupported by facts, that motivated the capital mob to action that day.

    The primary threat to our country today is not Covid, it isn’t the economy, it’s not the environment, nor is it social disparity. While all of these represent urgent and truly daunting challenges, the greatest danger threatening us today is the threat from within: The threat within our citizenry, within the halls of Congress, and, until recently, within the White House.

    It’s tempting to dismiss the people who stormed the capital as deranged bigots, but that would be a grievous error. They are our neighbors—the welfare mom, the Navy vet, the bartender, the off-duty police officer, the misguided legislator. These peoples’ actions may be the actions of insurrectionists, but they are also the actions, for the most part, of ordinary people who allowed themselves to be deceived by their president, by the pundits at conservative news sources, by their ministers.

    They view their actions not as shameful conduct that poses a threat to our democracy: Rather they see themselves as saviors of our democracy, summoned to action to address an untenable, albeit fictional, wrong. The events that have transpired since January  6 appear, from their perspective, to be just more evidence of the accuracy of their beliefs.

    But while their assumptions about the state of affairs in our country are incorrect, their dedication to those beliefs remains undiminished and their resolve to act on their beliefs undeterred.

    What the majority of us see as a singular attack on our nation’s capital, these people celebrate as the first strike in a pending revolution, an initial victory among many victories to come.

    Yet, heedless of this threat, Senate Republicans appear by some accounts poised to dismiss the threat to democracy embodied in the former president’s actions, to acquit him of the charge of incitement of insurrection against the government of the United States. Should they elect to do so, their action will only serve to further encourage those who would overthrow our government. In the MAGA cult’s eyes, it will vindicate the former president, or, more  accurately, confirm what they “knew” all along, that the impeachment was a farce from the beginning.

    Does anyone not believe that such an  outcome will only amplify the former president’s ability to further influence these so-called patriots, stiffening  their resolve to initiate further actions in their crusade for “justice?”

    These same senators are not blind to the stakes involved; most of them had a similar decision to make a year ago the first time the House held the former president to account for his actions. They fell short of fulfilling their duty then, and they will likely do so again this time, not because they mis-read the tea leaves, not because they misjudged this man’s character. They knew full well what he was capable of then, and they know it even better today. But will it persuade them to “do the right thing?”

    Recent history is not encouraging or, put another way, sycophancy by any other name still remains sycophancy. These senators’ lack of a patriot’s heart is all the more evident as, in the name of patriotism, they repeatedly take actions that are decidedly unpatriotic.

    There is no finer exemplar of this trait we call sycophancy than Lindsey Graham, as obsequious a legislator as ever haunted the halls of Congress. Unctuous and stultifying, a man who blithely takes smarmy to heretofore unseen depths, Graham is the perfect poster-boy for servile incivility.

    Graham yesterday characterized the impeachment as “an absurd case” and  said Republicans were offended by the House managers’ presentation.

    If the Senate does vote to acquit, Graham and his co-conspirators, for that is what they are—co-conspirators—will have earned themselves a special place in infamy alongside the likes of Aaron Burr and Jefferson Davis. And, true to their falseness,  they will have earned that distinction with dishonor!

    And the fate of our country?

    Well, thanks to the vote, that’s still up to us. For now, at least!

    Tim Konrad                                                          February 11, 2021

  • Curious about how Fox would spin today’s impeachment presentation, I subjected myself to a half-hour of the Tucker Carlson show this evening, where I learned that Officer Brian Sicknick did not die from injuries sustained at the hands of the mob that stormed the capital on January 6, nor did George Floyd perish from police abuse, as reported, but rather from a previously unreported overdose of fentanyl. Why, I pondered, wasn’t I made aware of these revelations sooner?

    No wonder the MAGA cult members have drifted so far from consensus reality!

    The senators charged with the responsibility of judging the former president’s actions surrounding the capital riot should reflect deeply on the effect their votes will have on the odds of our democracy’s ultimate survival.

    Rather than casting their votes based on fear of alienating their constituents and maybe losing re-election, Republican senators, and our nation, would be better served were they to fix their focus instead on fear of what may well result from the further empowerment of the former president’s followers, should they vote to acquit him.  

    The events of January 6 would never have occurred had these senators done their duty and voted to convict him the first time they had the chance.

    Condemn or condone—those are the only two choices available. A vote not to convict the former president is a vote to condone his behavior vis a vis the insurrection he egged on last January 6. Doing so would be akin to opening a Pandora’s Box of unwanted eventualities. No! The only real and reasonable choice is for condemnation. For conviction!

    In the end, no healing will be possible until those responsible for this attack on our democracy are held accountable for their actions, beginning with the former president.

    There can be no healing without accountability.

    Tim Konrad                                                          February 10, 2021

  • While driving in the countryside yesterday, I passed a small ranch nestled amongst a grove of trees near the crest of a hill. As I sped by, a slightly heavy-set middle-aged woman was walking up the long drive leading to the ranch house. Surrounding the house, in seeming random fashion, were various piles of wood and whatnot. Odd pieces of old-looking equipment and a couple of abandoned cars were strewn about in seemingly haphazard fashion–a not uncommon scene encountered while driving the byways of rural America.

    While noting the disarray, I found myself thinking of how the jumbled detritus might well serve as an apt metaphor for my life, depicting, as it were, the fascinating but entirely dysfunctional collection of unfinished projects I’ve accumulated along the way.

    Over the years, my palace of preempted possibilities, postponed propositions and paused projects has grown more expansive, year by year, until it’s become a behemoth of ponderous proportions.

    And that’s nothing to say about how handily my predilection for procrastination has passed over into the purview of the digital dimension. 

    I discovered early on the benefits to be derived from delaying decisions digitally, deferring that duty to a more convenient time, such as “later,” when I would, magically, feel more dedicated to digging into the details.

    Unsurprisingly, that special place I designated for the storage of incoming emails  diverted for further inspection in that mystical (and mostly mythical) time known as “later” quickly grew into a graveyard of good intentions, urgency having been dethroned by and transmuted into dregs of digital detritus.

    There inevitably comes a time in such stories involving squirreled-away ‘stuff’ when a reckoning is due. Or, in my case,  way past due.

    That time arrives when the time spent searching for something exceeds the time “saved” by storing it for future use. At that point, future use quickly becomes future abuse.

    When the present is subsumed by the past, thoughts about how we create our futures assume more relevance. The false economy of mortgaging tomorrow to dodge drudgery today is a self-defeating enterprise based on lies we tell ourselves to avoid taking care of business when matters are most relevant.

    Such accumulations, be they actual or virtual, represent the residue of repressed restraint, fogging the minds and blocking the energies of those condemned to reckon with them. The bedlam birthed by confusion and disorder fosters the misuse of valuable space that could be better served if not unduly burdened by clutter. Disorder creates confusion leading to virtual, physical and emotional chaos.  And therein might lie the answer.

    In current parlance, the word “chaos” is usually employed to denote complete disorder and confusion. A lesser-known meaning of the word is “the formless matter supposed to have existed before the creation of the universe.” https://www.bing.com/search?q=chaos+def&go=Search&qs=ds&form=QBRE

    In the Greek creation myths, chaos meant emptiness, the vast void, “the primordial state created by the separation of heaven and earth.” https://mythology.net/greek/greek-concepts/chaos

    Viewed thusly, might chaos offer a chance at a new start, a clean slate, or “tabula rasa” on which to erect new constructs less burdened by bedlam? Perhaps.

    Yet, as I write these words, I’m peripherally mindful of the various tasks I’m postponing in order to free up the time required to explore the ramifications of postponement.

    It’s clear that orderliness hasn’t yet become the defining feature of my daily doings. In the meantime, it appears I can at least count on irony to spice up the soup.

    Tim Konrad

    February 7, 2021

  • The Old Homestead and the Scene of the Crime

    Columbia was a lively place to inhabit in the 80s. The St. Charles Saloon, or the “Charlie,” as we locals called it, was a mere five-minute stroll from the house where I lived.  The Charlie was the hub of a vibrant social life graced by the offerings of a varied collection of talented musicians. The revered band, Fiddlestix, performed routinely on weekends, wowing and, at times, mystifying the hordes of tourists who passed through town on their weekend escapes from suburbia.

    Of the many adventures I had there, one of the more interesting memories from my time living in Columbia involved not musical escapades but a cross-species interaction I observed between a squirrel, a cat and a flock of about a half-dozen woodpeckers.

    The scene where the event unfolded was a telephone pole that stood at the edge of an open field across the street from my house. My roommate, Mike, and I happened to be sitting on a couch on the front porch one summer afternoon when a young and inexperienced gray squirrel decided to scale the pole in the hopes of raiding a woodpecker nest that clung to the base of the upper crosspiece near the pole’s top.

    Our perch allowed us a great view of the business that unfolded before our eyes that afternoon.

    When the hapless squirrel began its climb, it set in motion a series of events in which the squirrel got much more than it bargained for.

    The prospective purloiner’s push into the birds’ domain did not go unnoticed by the woodpeckers, who quickly sprung to alarm and began swooping perilously close to the squirrel, attempting to dissuade it from further advancing its position.

    After the birds had made several sorties, punctuated by pauses to permit their brethren to parry, the squirrel, appearing to have second thoughts about the efficacy of his enterprise, began descending the pole in retreat. By this time, however, the action had caught the attention of my cat, Jack, who had positioned himself at the base of the pole in order to snatch the squirrel on its descent.

    The squirrel, comprehending the threat lurking beneath, now began climbing upward again, only this time to escape the cat, who had started his own climb upward to close the gap between him and his prey.  As the beleaguered beast ascended, the birds renewed their aerial assault against him with newfound vigor, taking turns as they repeatedly dive-bombed him, forcing him to inch downward just as the cat was narrowing the gap between them.  

    This push-and-pull continued, the birds carrying on their coordinated aerobatics while the squirrel grew more frantic as it repeatedly retreated downward from the threat above only to have to then flee upward to escape the peril menacing it from below. At one point, it nearly fell to the ground. Unnerved and exhausted by being beset by foes on all fronts, both feathered and furry, the misguided mammal appeared entirely out of its element.

    As the encounter drew on, the birds began to show fatigue too, tempering their tandem thrashing with longer and longer periods of rest, their tongues drooping beneath their beaks as they gasped for breath. Jack also began to show signs of tiring, but not sufficient to put him off his pursuit.

    Lost in a limbo of its own invention, the repressed rodent, now harried, helpless and hopelessly hemmed-in after a full forty-five minutes of flak, finally appeared to realize that the cat posed the greater risk. It resumed its ascent once again, only this time hunkered-down and humiliated, no longer interested in the woodpecker’s nest; now, solely intent on seeking shelter from the cat, birds be damned.

    The similarly worn-down woodpeckers offered less resistance than before, allowing, albeit grudgingly, the squirrel to inch closer to their territory, but only to the top of the lower of the pole’s two cross-pieces, where it huddled, flattening itself as best it could against the corner where the cross-piece met the pole, two feet short of the nest, remaining there while the birds fluttered about it authoritatively, surveilling it regularly lest it attempt further intransigence.

    At that point, Mike and I grew tired too, and left the battle to the birds while we adjourned to the ‘Charlie’ to recount the saga we’d just seen over beers and nachos.

    Tim Konrad

    January 30. 2021

  • One day, when I was around thirteen, I came home from school unexpectedly early. Upon arriving, I was puzzled to find our family veterinarian was there. The vet, Dr. Burns, seemed equally surprised to see me, as was my mother. I stood by and watched them while they both scrambled in discomfort trying to find the words to explain that the purpose of the vet’s visit was to euthanize our family’s dog. Prince had been my companion for most of my young life and the news, while not entirely surprising, caught me entirely off-guard.

    I had known for a while that Prince, or “Princie,” as I often called him, was not well. Somewhere over a dozen or so years old, a goodly time for a cocker spaniel mix, there had been prior discussion around the dinner table that Princie was nearing the end of his life. But my parents had given no clear indication beforehand that they had set up a course of action to address the situation.

    As we gathered around Princie in the back yard, Dr. Burns told me that quality of life for our pet was no longer an option. Putting him gently to sleep was the only humane choice, he explained. Perhaps I might consider going inside while he went about his task, he suggested, the underlying, unspoken message being to save me the pain of having to watch my childhood companion while he was being humanely “sent to a better place.”

    I didn’t want to leave my old friend, I told him. I wanted to be there, to cradle and comfort Princie while he inserted the needle into Prince’s forearm and emptied the syringe of its life-ending contents.

    So that’s what I did. I sat down beside Prince and held his decrepit body in my lap, comforting him and easing him through his fear of this stranger’s presence and his suspicious behavior. Prince had never liked going to the veterinarian’s office; it had always included, in one way or another, an element of pain for him; it was ever a source of alarm. Even though this encounter with the vet was occurring on his turf for a change, those old associations were not lost to him.

    I held Prince and stroked his head until he fell asleep and his life slowly ebbed from his body.

    Had I not accidentally stumbled upon this scheme my parents had hatched to “save me” from experiencing first-hand loss in all its rawness, forgiving them for so mis-reading, as benevolent as their intentions were, the import of the event and its potential impact on me, would have been very difficult.

    Had I come home at the usual time, the vet would have already been there and gone, taking Prince’s lifeless body with him and leaving me to grapple with having been deprived of the opportunity to provide comfort in Prince’s hour of need, say my proper good-byes and obtain whatever modicum of closure can be attained under such circumstances.

    There’s a subtle and not intended cruelty inherent in actions designed to save people from having to experience pain. Such acts, usually motivated by concern or love, nonetheless interrupt the natural flow of consequence. By prohibiting the occurrence of “closure,” they deny those being “protected” the opportunity to experience the range of emotions accompanying such events, thus interfering with their ability to fully process their feelings and achieve the emotional state of acceptance necessary to move forward following the event’s completion.

    As difficult as it was to be present when Princie was dispatched to the spirit world, my sense of loss would have been far greater had I been denied that experience.   In such moments, there is no better substitute for simply being honest, no matter how painful it may be to do so.

    The truth is always the better course of action.

    Tim Konrad

    January 25, 2021